Operation: Solar Inspections // Issue: Inefficient Inspections
The Hidden Cost of Manual Solar Inspections: Why Time Is Your Most Expensive Asset
When we speak with solar farm operators about the cost of inspection, the conversation always begins with equipment and labor costs. However, there is a number that’s never brought up, and it’s the number that should keep the CFO up at night.
The 500-Hour Problem
Here’s what most people don’t know: manually inspecting a 20-megawatt solar farm takes more than 500 hours. That’s right. As your team is walking the rows with thermal guns, taking samples of partial sections and recording data panel by panel, your plant is running sub-capacity or, worse, hiding major problems that are hemorrhaging money every day.
The math is brutal. With downtime costs ranging from $1,000 to $5,000 per day, even a week-long inspection can cost you $35,000 in lost revenue opportunity. And that's before you factor in the faults you didn't catch because manual sampling only covers parts of your array.
In one multi-site trial, a 97% efficiency gain was realized over traditional approaches, with about $1,250 per megawatt in savings. For a 20-megawatt plant, this translates to a $25,000 reduction in costs alone, without considering the value of revenue protection afforded by earlier fault detection.
Thermal Sensitivity: The Detail That Matters
The thermal sensitivity of most industry-standard drones is around 40 millikelvins. However, the platform we utilize is able to go below 30 millikelvins, which may seem like a very small difference, but it has huge implications.
Think of it this way: the earlier the fault detection, the sooner a failing panel is caught before it becomes a string failure, or a hot spot before it becomes a fire hazard. This degree of thermal information is beyond the capability of handheld guns to detect, especially when human fatigue is considered in day-long manual inspections.
Why Standardization Matters
Technology is only as good as the insights it provides. The inspections performed to the standards of IEC 62446-3 provide easy to digest results in the form of thermal maps overlaid with GPS data, panel-level anomaly identification, and recommendations for correction.
This standardization reduces the time from "we have data" to "we've fixed the problem," which is what ultimately determines whether an inspection provides ROI or simply creates reports that reside in a folder.
Key Takeaways
The promise of solar energy has always been about efficiency. Turning sunlight into electricity with as little loss as possible. It’s high time that our inspection methods also lived by the same principle.
When you can compress a 500-hour process into 4 hours while also enhancing accuracy and fault detection, you’re doing more than saving money on inspections. You’re revolutionizing your approach and opening that time/revenue up to making your operation better.
The answer isn’t whether drone inspections are more efficient. That’s clear from the data. The question is: How much revenue are you leaving on the table while you decide?
Get in touch
